Paris's city hall formally acknowledged last month that duplicate and unauthorised reproductions of protected images — from Haussmann-era facades to contemporary public art installations — had reached a volume that existing municipal bylaws were never designed to handle. The issue, quietly building since the early 2010s, has crystallised into a concrete policy problem following the explosion of digital content generated during and after the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games.
The stakes are real. The Games left behind a documented surge in commercially licensed and unlicensed visual content featuring Paris landmarks, Seine riverbanks, and the city's newly regenerated quays between the Pont d'Iéna and the Pont de Bercy. Tourism boards, commercial agencies, news organisations, and private individuals all produced and circulated images of the same locations, often with overlapping or conflicting usage rights. The result, according to copyright lawyers working in the 9th arrondissement's cluster of intellectual property firms, is a market clogged with near-identical visuals and a legal framework that has not kept pace.
A Problem Built Over Years
The roots go back further than the Olympics. France's 2016 reform of the loi relative à la liberté de la création, à l'architecture et au patrimoine — commonly called the LCAP law — established clearer protections for architectural works visible from public spaces, but it did not resolve what happens when hundreds of commercially identical photographs of, say, the glass pyramid at the Palais Royal or the street art murals along the Canal Saint-Martin all enter circulation simultaneously.
The Centre Pompidou's image-rights team and the Établissement public du musée du Louvre both tightened their licensing protocols between 2019 and 2022, but those changes addressed institutional collections, not the broader streetscape. Meanwhile, platforms hosting short-form video grew. The quais of the Rive Gauche, the newly opened sections of the Promenade Plantée extension, and the refurbished Place de la République became default backdrops for commercial shoots whose rights were rarely cleared beyond a single use.
By 2023, the issue had a name inside the Direction des Affaires Culturelles de la Ville de Paris: prolifération des visuels doublons, or duplicate visual proliferation. Internal working groups were convened. Nothing was published. Then the Olympics arrived, and the volume of reproduced imagery tripled, according to estimates circulated at a February 2026 seminar organised by the Syndicat National de l'Édition Photographique at its headquarters near the Bourse de Commerce.
What the Current Moment Demands
Paris is not alone in confronting this. Rome's Soprintendenza Capitolina and New York City's Metropolitan Transportation Authority have both issued updated image-use policies in the past 18 months. But the French capital's situation carries additional complexity because of the ongoing Grand Paris Express construction, which is generating its own category of contested imagery: infrastructure works in Saint-Denis, Nanterre, and Vitry-sur-Seine are being photographed for documentation, journalism, and commercial use simultaneously, often by parties whose permissions do not overlap.
The practical consequence for photographers, agencies, and publishers is that clearing a single image of the Stade de France's exterior for commercial use can now involve as many as four separate rights-holders, depending on whether architectural, municipal, sporting, and event-related rights are all in play. Licensing fees for a single verified, non-duplicate commercial image of a Seine-adjacent landmark rose by an estimated 30 percent between 2022 and 2025, according to figures presented at the same February seminar.
What happens next depends heavily on whether the Direction des Affaires Culturelles publishes the framework document it has been drafting since late 2025. Photographers and agencies working regularly along the Boulevard Périphérique regeneration corridor and in the 13th arrondissement's urban-art districts are watching closely. The practical advice from IP lawyers in the interim is straightforward: register every commercial image at the point of creation, document the specific location and date, and do not assume that a prior licence for a similar image covers a new shoot at the same site. The city's legal terrain has shifted, even if the formal rules have not yet caught up.